How much can a country intervene in the FX markets?
The answer could be dependent on the domestic liquidity
where India is already struggling with addition systematic surplus post
demonetization. Or the answer could be derived from the US filter used to
derive a list of currency manipulators. The US would label a country a currency
manipulator if it meets the 3 criteria below:
1.
More than 2% of GDP of current account surplus
2.
More than USD 20 bn of bilateral trade surplus
with the US
3.
More than 2% of GDP of intervention in the
currency markets to depreciate the non US currency
Currently India only meets the 2nd criteria. None
of the countries met all 3 criteria and 6 countries which met 2 out of 3 were
put on a watch list (Switzerland, Germany, Japan, China, South Korea and
Taiwan). India now is running the risk of meeting the 3rd criteria
of intervention and therefore could be put on the watch list.
India has added almost USD 37 bn of reserves in 2017
including spot and forward positions (table below). India’s GDP at 2.11
trillion USD allows it to intervene to the extent of USD 42 bn for the entire
year. Therefore perhaps RBI is reaching the limit to the intervention it would
want to do in the FX markets. The thought that it would ignore the US watch
list looks farfetched because of the heavy dependence of India’s exports,
investments and specially the performance of IT industry on the US economy.
USD Billion
|
31-Dec-16
|
31-Mar-17
|
02-Jun-17
|
Movement in 2017
|
Spot Reserves
|
359
|
370
|
381
|
22
|
Forward Reserves
|
2.7
|
13
|
18 (assumed as data is not available as yet)
|
15.3
|
Total
|
361.7
|
383
|
381
|
37.3
|
No comments:
Post a Comment